plane/.claude/skills/create-pull-request/SKILL.md

name, description, user_invocable

name	description	user_invocable
create-pull-request	Use when creating a pull request for the current branch — gathers branch context, generates a PR description following the repo's pull_request_template.md, and creates the PR with a Plane work item ID prefix in the title.	true

Create PR

Create a pull request using the repo's PR template, a Plane work item ID as the title prefix, and a fully filled-out description based on the actual diff.

Workflow

1. Determine the base branch: Default to preview unless the user specifies otherwise.

2. Gather context (in parallel):

   • git status -s — check for uncommitted changes
   • git diff <base>...HEAD --stat — files changed
   • git log <base>...HEAD --oneline — all commits on the branch
   • git diff <base>...HEAD --no-color — full diff for understanding changes (if very large, focus on the most important files first)
   • git rev-parse --abbrev-ref --symbolic-full-name @{u} — check if branch tracks a remote
   • Read .github/pull_request_template.md from the repo root

3. Determine work item ID:

   • Extract from branch name if it contains an identifier (e.g., chore/silo-1146-foo → SILO-1146, feat/web-1234-x → WEB-1234)
   • If not found in branch name, ask the user

4. Draft the PR using the template from step 2:

   Title: [WORK-ITEM-ID] <type>: <concise summary> (under 70 chars)

   • Type reflects the change: fix, feat, chore, refactor, docs, perf, etc.

   Body: Fill in every section from the PR template based on the actual diff:

   • Description — Clear, concise summary of what the PR does and why. Focus on the "what" and "why", not line-by-line changes. Mention important implementation decisions.
   • Type of Change — Check the appropriate box(es): Bug fix, Feature, Improvement, Code refactoring, Performance improvements, Documentation update.
   • Screenshots and Media — Leave a placeholder: <!-- Add screenshots here -->
   • Test Scenarios — Suggest concrete scenarios grounded in the actual changes (e.g., "Navigate to project settings and verify the new toggle works"), not generic ones.
   • References — Include the work item ID, any linked issues the user mentions, and any Sentry issue links/IDs (e.g., SENTRY-ABC123 or Sentry URLs) referenced earlier in the conversation.

   Append a Claude Code session line at the bottom of the body.

5. Push and create (in parallel where possible):

   • Push branch with -u if no upstream is set
   • Create PR via gh pr create using a HEREDOC for the body

6. Return the PR URL to the user.

Example Title

[SILO-1146] fix: allow relative URLs for configuration_url and improve app tile visibility

Guidelines

• Keep the description concise but informative
• Use bullet points when listing multiple changes
• Focus on user-facing impact, not implementation details
• Don't fabricate test scenarios that aren't relevant to the actual changes

Common Mistakes

• Summarizing only the latest commit instead of all commits on the branch
• Forgetting to check for an upstream before pushing
• Using a work item ID format that doesn't match the branch convention
• Wrapping the PR body in a code fence when passing it to gh pr create